If you haven't already read my previous post, I suggest you do that now, as it lays the foundation for this article.
Recalling the definition of a limit
The statement limx→af(x)=L has the following precise definition. Given any real number ε>0, there exists another real number δ>0 so that if0<|x−a|<δ,then|f(x)−L|<ε
Given that f(x)=1x, let's prove that limx→4f(x)=14.
Again, we try to find a good δ, we can start off with |1x−14|<ε|4−x4x|<ε14⋅1x|4−x|<ε14⋅1x|x−4|<ε|x−4|<4xε
Ok, we have our |4−x|, but, we can't have ε dependant on x. Let's see what we can do about that 1/x on the left, since we have an opportunity to get rid of it on the right hand side. Knowing that we want to keep x close to 4, let's declare the following |4−x|<1−1<x<13<x<5 Ok, this is looking interesting, let's choose the small x, namely 3, because, you know, mathematicians aren't afraid of thinking small... keeping that in mind let's take the reciprocal of this inequality 15<1x<13 And, there we have it, we can use δ=12ε provided that |x−4|<1, or more precisely, min(12ε,1). Why can we say this?
Let f(x)=1x. Then limx→4f(x)=14.
Using the precise definition; If 0<|x−4|<δ, then |f(x)−14|<ε
Let ε>0, if |x−4|<1 then δ=min(12ε,1) and 1x<13. Therefore we have |f(x)−14|=|1x−14|=|4−x4x|=14⋅1x|4−x|=14⋅1x|x−4|<14⋅13|x−4|<14⋅13δ<112δ<11212ε|f(x)−14|<ε
Let's not lose track of our goal here. What we just proved, was that if we satisfy the conditions provided in the proof, the function will be within a certain ε of 1/4. Or, to put it another way, the output will be as close as we want it to 1/4. You can test these out by plugging some values into x and see what happens.
With a little bit of thought, we can see that is false to say limx→01x=0. Or put another way, it's not true that for every ε>0, we can find a |x−0| that makes |f(x)−0|<ε. There is no |f(x)| <ε! Or, let's say we want to be within 1/100 of 0. So we have to satisfy |x−0|<1/100 and |f(x)−0|<1/100. Observe Let x=1/100|x−0|=|1/100−0|=|1/100| And we have |1x−0|=|11100|=1⋅100=100 As a matter of fact, the smaller we make |x−0|, the larger |f(x)−0| becomes. We say that f(x)→∞, which reads "F of x, approaches infinity." And if we think about this for a moment, it makes perfect sense, if we keep in mind that 1x=1⋅x−1 So how do we prove that limx→01x=∞? Or put another way, how do we prove that the function grows without bounds, as the input approaches 0? First, let's, define precisely what it means for a limit to approach infinity.
limx→af(x)=∞ means that for every positive number M there is a positive number δ such that f(x)>M whenever 0<|x−a|<δ
All right, let's prove it for 1/x. First we need to find a δ that works. So, we want δ, such that f(x)>M f(x)>M=1x>M whenever 0<|x−0|<δ⟹1>xM⟹x<1M whenever |x|<δ So now we have δ=1M
By definition limx→01x=∞ means that for every positive number M there is a positive number δ such that 1x>M whenever 0<|x−0|<δ
Let M>0, choose δ=1M. If 0<|x−0|<δ. Observe |x|<δx<δ1x>1δ1x>11M1x>M Thus by definition, limx→01x=∞
Ok, let's do more testing. Let's use δ=1/10, so that means we have to choose a |x|<1/10. So, let's use 1/100. Plugging it into 1/x, remembering that M=10 we get 11100=1⋅1001=100>10
I know, it seems like a lot of hand waving. But that's part of mathematics, I like to call it "creative trickery".